Elsevier

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volume 289, 1 September 2017, Pages 23-30
Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Research article
Measurement of phase resetting curves using optogenetic barrage stimuli

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.06.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Optogenetic methods were adapted to measure phase resetting curves (PRCs).

  • The PRCs yielded phase models that predicted inter-spike intervals.

  • Optogenetic PRC estimation is potentially suitable for in vivo applications.

Abstract

Background

The phase resetting curve (PRC) is a primary measure of a rhythmically firing neuron's responses to synaptic input, quantifying the change in phase of the firing oscillation as a function of the input phase. PRCs provide information about whether neurons will synchronize due to synaptic coupling or shared input. However, PRC estimation has been limited to in vitro preparations where stable intracellular recordings can be obtained and background activity is minimal, and new methods are required for in vivo applications.

New method

We estimated PRCs using dense optogenetic stimuli and extracellular spike recording. Autonomously firing neurons in substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) of Thy1-channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2) transgenic mice were stimulated with random barrages of light pulses, and PRCs were determined using multiple linear regression.

Results

The PRCs obtained were type-I, showing only phase advances in response to depolarizing input, and generally sloped upward from early to late phases. Secondary PRCs, indicating the effect on the subsequent ISI, showed phase delays primarily for stimuli arriving at late phases. Phase models constructed from the optogenetic PRCs accounted for a large fraction of the variance in ISI length and provided a good approximation of the spike-triggered average stimulus.

Comparison with existing methods

Compared to methods based on intracellular current injection, the new method sacrifices some temporal resolution. However, it should be much more widely applicable in vivo, because only extracellular recording and optogenetic stimulation are required.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate PRC estimation using methods suitable for in vivo applications.

Introduction

The phase resetting curve (PRC) measures the input-sensitivity of an oscillating neuron's spike timing, as a function of the oscillation phase at which the input arrives. Thus, the PRC is a primary measure of the input-output relationship of a neuron that fires autonomously, or any neuron operating at an average level of excitation above its rheobase. It has been shown that PRC shapes can predict the tendency of neurons to synchronize or remain asynchronous in response to synaptic or electrical coupling, as well as the strength of synchronization by correlated input (Marella and Ermentrout, 2008, Achuthan and Canavier, 2009, Smeal et al., 2010, Stiefel and Ermentrout, 2016). However, doubt has persisted about the applicability of these findings to in vivo conditions, for two main reasons. First, PRCs have traditionally been measured in neurons firing with great regularity, using single, widely separated stimuli with little resemblance to the barrages of synaptic input thought to occur in vivo. Second, the condition of the cells may be altered by damage during brain slice preparation, deviations from normal physiological temperature or oxygenation, and/or lack of critical neuromodulators.

To address these concerns, it would be valuable to obtain PRCs in vivo. In principle, this could be accomplished by extracellular synaptic stimulation, intracellular current injection, or either direct or synaptic optogenetic stimulation. With any of these methods, it is expected that accurate PRC estimation would be difficult to achieve by the traditional method of low-frequency single-pulse stimulation, because of high levels of ongoing synaptic input producing inter-spike interval (ISI) variability. Even in brain slice preparations, this method requires a long period of data acquisition and generally yields PRCs with a large standard error. However, this limitation has recently been overcome by noise-based methods of PRC estimation, which utilize much higher stimulus densities (Ermentrout et al., 2007, Ota et al., 2009, Wilson et al., 2014). Phase models based on noise-derived PRCs have been shown to predict a large fraction of the observed ISI variance, even with large-amplitude stimuli that one might expect to violate the weak-input assumption of most theoretical studies (Wilson et al., 2014). Because high-density stimuli produce relatively large ISI variance, they should compete better with ongoing synaptic activity, allowing PRC estimation under a wider range of conditions.

In the present study, we extend noise-based PRC estimation to utilize direct optogenetic barrage stimulation of recorded neurons. Because intracellular recording is not required to deliver highly controlled stimuli, extracellular spike recording is sufficient. The method was tested using substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) neurons in brain slices from Thy1-channelrhodopsin 2 (ChR2) transgenic mice (Arenkiel et al., 2007), which express ChR2 in multiple brain regions including SNr.

Section snippets

Animals

Studies utilized Thy1-ChR2 homozygous and heterozygous transgenic mice (line 18, B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-COP4/EYFP)18Gfng/J). Mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and bred in-house. The University of Texas at San Antonio Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal procedures, and all procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Brain slice preparation

Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and euthanized by

Current responses to optogenetic barrages

SNr neurons in brain slices from Thy1-ChR2 transgenic mice were stimulated with 9 s barrages of wide-field blue light stimuli, which directly activate ChR2 located on the soma and dendrites of the recorded cell. Potential activation of glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic inputs was blocked by NBQX, CPP, and picrotoxin. The stimuli were barrages of 0.5 or 1 ms light pulses separated by random inter-pulse intervals with a mean of 5 ms, producing current waveforms that were dense in large-amplitude

Discussion

The results of the present study show that PRCs of oscillating neurons in SNr can be estimated using non-invasive spike recording, direct stimulation using ChR2, and multiple linear regression analysis. Phase models based on these PRCs capture a great deal of the input-output relationship for these cells. Models incorporating the second-order PRCs could potentially allow even better spike time prediction, but would require further investigation to understand how the primary and secondary

Conclusions

The methods described here provide an approach that may be useful for obtaining PRCs in vivo. Such measurements could provide insight into network interactions that influence neuronal oscillations. When a population of neurons is stimulated by shared, time-varying optogenetic input, the common input is likely to produce correlated firing. The degree to which this occurs will depend on the properties of the individual neurons − firing rates, PRC shapes and overall sensitivities − and the

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers NS047085, NS097185) and the Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation, Kerrville, Texas. The sponsors had no direct role in study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication. We thank Sharmon Lebby for excellent technical assistance.

References (16)

  • B.R. Arenkiel et al.

    In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • S. Achuthan et al.

    Phase-resetting curves determine synchronization, phase locking, and clustering in networks of neural oscillators

    J. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • S.D. Burton et al.

    Intrinsic heterogeneity in oscillatory dynamics limits correlation-induced neural synchronization

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2012)
  • R.J. Butera et al.

    Weak phase-resetting in neural oscillators

    Conf. Proc. IEEE Med. Biol. Soc.

    (2005)
  • G.B. Ermentrout et al.

    Relating neural dynamics to neural coding

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2007)
  • J.A. Goldberg et al.

    Spectral reconstruction of phase response curves reveals the synchronization properties of mouse globus pallidus neurons

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2013)
  • E.M. Izhikevich

    Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting

    (2007)
  • N.C. Klapoetke et al.

    Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations

    Nat. Methods

    (2014)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text